PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus H110M-A/M.2 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170704 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Nov 25 '18 at 18:17 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 54% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.3%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.4%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 24 6.4 16 16 30 MB/s
|
19.5%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
13GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.2 4.4 4.4 4.2 4.6 MB/s
|
6.59%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDD1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 392x |
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 381x |
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 353x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 400x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 347x |
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 217x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $234 |