Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675 4,275 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 78.5 2-Core 160 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 604 54% 458 Pts	64-Core 1,162 72% 1,162 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Zotac(19DA 9454) 2GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	29% Poor	Lighting 35.4 Reflection 27.2 Parallax 32.9 29% 31.8 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 35.4 Splatting 34.3 29% 36 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5A SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 121 122 122 122 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.3% Below average	Read 128 Write 121 Mixed 121 SusWrite 121 28% 123 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 16 62% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 81.1 DQ Write 91.9 DQ Mixed 42.4 44% 71.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 753GB free Firmware: 0710 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 25 25 25 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 28.2 Write 21.2 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 25.8 18% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.5 145% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:83 0B NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG ID:83 0B NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG ID:83 0B NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 58GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.1% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 19.6 54% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9 26% 8.93 GB/s	Latency 61.7 65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16