Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP 530 Notebook PC(KD085AA#ABZ) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 30D5
Memory	0.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080318
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '18 at 07:01
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron M 440 159 User benchmarks, average bench 25% U10, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	Memory 56.7 1-Core 12.6 2-Core 10.5 23% 26.6 Pts	4-Core 12.6 8-Core 11.2 2% 11.9 Pts	64-Core 16.6 1% 16.6 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 32%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SH00R120GB 120GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02T130S4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 3.3 2.2 4.7 2.8 4.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 85.6 Write 87.2 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 6.1 48% 64 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.18% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 1.8 6% 2 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 1.1 3% 1.03 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.18% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16