PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T5610 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T5610 (all builds) |
Memory | 55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130905 |
Uptime | 9.5 Days |
Run Date | Nov 24 '18 at 14:42 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
74.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
111%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung PM851 M.2 2280 256GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT25D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 142 128 141 98 96 MB/s
|
64.4%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
623GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 425 439 399 443 454 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
75GB free
Firmware: 57DA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 636 637 743 590 152 157 MB/s
|
142%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B1G70BH0-YK0 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
74.8%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples | 66x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v21stBench 73%, 400 samples | 48x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 79x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 38x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 26x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 23% - Poor | Total price: $109 |