| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 2.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus M60J (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK M60J |
| Memory | 3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100511 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 24 '18 at 14:30 |
| Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 43% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
|
52.3%
Above average
|
46% 67.3 Pts
|
18% 144 Pts
|
12% 185 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 240M
Asus(1043 202A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
|
2.72%
Terrible
|
2% 3.1 fps
|
3% 3.87 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 84 82 77 72 72 MB/s
|
38.1%
Below average
|
37% 164 MB/s
|
57% 19.3 MB/s
|
98% 140 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
58GB free
Firmware: EXM03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 221 215 222 222 222 MB/s
|
51.8%
Above average
|
48% 215 MB/s
|
68% 22.3 MB/s
|
134% 178 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
101GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.3 9.1 9.6 9.6 9.3 MB/s
|
9.19%
Terrible
|
18% 15.1 MB/s
|
76% 1.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5428-040.A01G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.3%
Below average
|
36% 12.5 GB/s
|
25% 8.83 GB/s
|
53% 75.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M60J Builds (Compare 13 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus M60J
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples | 11x |
| Core i7 Q 820Intel $119Bench 52%, 2,269 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $220 |