Asus B150 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B150 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime6 Days
Run DateNov 24 '18 at 02:58
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 227
73% 135 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 408
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 60
56% 66.1 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 65.8
53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 150 120GB-$89
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 395
Write 394
Mixed 314
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 22.1
89% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 262
204% 282 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 100%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
93GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 361 309 269 269 260 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 414
Mixed 353
SusWrite 291
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 42
141% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 325
243% 325 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 134%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
574GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3GC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 125 124 124 124 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 117
Write 119
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 123
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 21.2
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 1,009 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus B150 PRO GAMING/AURA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $283
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback