Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '18 at 23:27
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Memory 98.5 1-Core 116 2-Core 207 83% 140 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 528 56% 446 Pts	64-Core 529 33% 529 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6299) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Lighting 156 Reflection 157 Parallax 135 127% 149 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 151 Splatting 117 106% 130 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141 6,458 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C4005T2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 101 206 200 129 195 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Read 932 Write 680 Mixed 485 SusWrite 178 126% 569 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 35.1 114% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 418 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 105 124% 222 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 159%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 18GB free Firmware: 03.03V01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 92 78 68 103 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 110 Write 117 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 88.6 72% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 68%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 178GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 78 77 77 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 89.7 Write 95.7 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 78.6 60% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 62%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 103 101 103 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 108 Write 95 Mixed 66 SusWrite 102 68% 92.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 63%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB 7,568 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 126 126 127 126 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 130 Write 125 Mixed 97.2 SusWrite 126 161% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 105%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB 7,568 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 978GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 92 95 97 96 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 101 Write 74.5 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 95.9 104% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 105%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1.5TB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 91 97 96 97 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 134 Write 128 Mixed 62 SusWrite 95.7 137% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 60%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1.5TB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 90 95 95 95 96 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 118 Write 113 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 94.3 130% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x4GB 4,979 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	76.5% Very good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 24.4 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 22.5 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 43.8 91% 43.8 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	396x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	105x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	63x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	56x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	30x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	20x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	19x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $722

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16