Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3612QM 11,760 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Memory 78.3 1-Core 48.4 2-Core 86.4 47% 71 Pts	4-Core 155 8-Core 276 26% 215 Pts	64-Core 291 18% 291 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 5000) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.22% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 3.19 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.42 fps	MRender 3.52 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.52 3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.22% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 396GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 391 384 405 399 407 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Read 476 Write 433 Mixed 324 SusWrite 391 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 55.9 4K Mixed 30.8 114% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 105 124% 214 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GB 1,654 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	52% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 17.2 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 11.6 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 83.7 48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16