Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120410
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateNov 23 '18 at 00:05
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 625
59% 491 Pts
64-Core 800
50% 800 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
MSI(1462 3363) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 159
Parallax 150
117% 151 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 142
Splatting 116
103% 127 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 416 421 429 427 435 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 465
Write 460
Mixed 321
SusWrite 426
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 27.7
106% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 83.6
DQ Mixed 119
98% 145 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 133%
Seagate SkyHawk 3TB (2016)-$85
281GB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 74 79 76 74 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 69.3
Write 92
Mixed 44
SusWrite 74
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 104%
Corsair Voyager GT 3.0 128GB
116GB free, PID 1a09, Corsair Flash Voyager GT 128GB
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 77 105 102 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 107
Write 148
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 91.4
147% 107 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1
106% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 61%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
22GB free, PID 6544, Kingston DataTraveller SE9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 1.2 3.8 4.1 4.1 3.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 32.3
Write 5.3
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 3.2
11% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Corsair Flash Voyager 2GB
2GB free, PID 2517, Corsair Voyager 2GB
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.3 8.7 8.7 9.4 9.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 9.8
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 9.3
14% 11 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.5% Very good
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 26.5
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback