Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 55 2-Core 112 54% 84.9 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 334 34% 278 Pts	64-Core 336 21% 336 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 66%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 408GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 376 325 293 287 279 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 367 Write 379 Mixed 326 SusWrite 323 79% 349 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 45.7 150% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 39.6 DQ Write 96.4 DQ Mixed 54.2 45% 63.4 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.6% Below average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 13 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 10.7 24% 8.37 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	34x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	32x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	32x

GPU
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples	15x
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples	8x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $446

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16