User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardSupermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150116
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 22 '18 at 19:06
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60.5% Good
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 182
66% 139 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 528
54% 424 Pts
64-Core 718
48% 718 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 445
Reflection 396
Parallax 422
117% 421 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 425
Splatting 257
113% 312 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 113%
Great: 115%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$107
638GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 379 390 389 386 387 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 410
Mixed 412
SusWrite 384
94% 415 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 41.9
134% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 303
234% 320 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 125%
Samsung 840 250GB-$199
79GB free
Firmware: AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 249 248 249 249 249 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 432
Write 250
Mixed 176
SusWrite 249
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 23.4
101% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 57.8
104% 210 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 85%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$107
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 104 104 105 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 85.8
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 102
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
75% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE600 12TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: T3D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 187 186 189 192 191 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 190
Mixed 102
SusWrite 189
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.3
339% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 108%
Great: 135%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: GX2M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 128 123 128 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66% Good
Read 102
Write 112
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 127
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.3
139% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M393B5270DH0-YK0 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 36.7
111% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12.3
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 99%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback