Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180403
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '18 at 16:02
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Memory 92.8 1-Core 131 2-Core 265 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 527 8-Core 697 78% 612 Pts	64-Core 779 48% 779 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Lighting 47.6 Reflection 32.1 Parallax 39.4 39% 39.7 fps	MRender 39.1 Gravity 42.4 Splatting 37.3 32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 428GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 384 390 390 390 400 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Read 324 Write 411 Mixed 285 SusWrite 390 80% 353 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 28 122% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 286 231% 326 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 117%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 882GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 181 179 184 183 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 169 Mixed 91.8 SusWrite 181 118% 161 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 1,438 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2.5TB free, PID d010 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 145 146 145 145 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 144 Write 152 Mixed 35.9 SusWrite 145 158% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.1% Very good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 21.7 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 22.1 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	210x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	168x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	157x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	185x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	173x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	127x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,049

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16