Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3-$256 2,019 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Memory 95.7 1-Core 107 2-Core 191 78% 131 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 392 54% 400 Pts	64-Core 396 24% 396 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P4600 2,141 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 0791) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3055 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.28% Terrible	Lighting 4.67 Reflection 6.38 Parallax 5.66 4% 5.57 fps	MRender 9 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 7.43 5% 6.29 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.28% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 512GB-$209 3,350 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 310GB free (System drive) Firmware: O0919A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 501 Write 359 Mixed 317 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 72.9 4K Mixed 41.3 134% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 188 155% 223 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS1GLK64W6H 2x8GB 210 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.8% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 10.3 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 9.5 28% 9.83 GB/s	Latency 55.1 73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16