Samsung R520/R522/R620

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Samsung R520/R522/R620 (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG R520/R522/R620
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '18 at 23:27
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme X9100-$150 548 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Memory 76.1 1-Core 43.6 2-Core 81.9 44% 67.2 Pts	4-Core 86.8 8-Core 86.5 12% 86.7 Pts	64-Core 82.2 5% 82.2 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 4,405 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C050) 1GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.03% Terrible	Lighting 4.8 Reflection 7 Parallax 3 4% 4.93 fps	MRender 5.24 Gravity 3.13 Splatting 6.7 4% 5.02 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.03% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA12.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 164 84 87 88 166 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.5% Below average	Read 183 Write 67.1 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 133 26% 119 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 29 4K Mixed 16.3 59% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 75.1 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 130 93% 117 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 90%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 518GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 30 Write 21.9 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 22.9 32% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	19.4% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 6.03 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.13 GB/s	Latency 88.1 45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical R520/R522/R620 Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung R520/R522/R620

CPU
Core2 Duo T6400Intel $99Bench 34%, 4,995 samples	12x
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	11x
Core2 Duo P7450Intel $90Bench 36%, 2,755 samples	10x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4650ATIBench 3%, 4,405 samples	38x
Mobility Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 2,791 samples	21x
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	3x

SSD
INTENSO 120GBBench 69%, 577 samples	3x
128GB 128GBNetacBench 58%, 1,666 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	50x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	7x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $99

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16