Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170905
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '18 at 21:22
Run Duration358 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 224
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 768
79% 638 Pts
64-Core 998
62% 998 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.81
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.6% Very good
Lighting 62.7
Reflection 199
Parallax 200
51% 154 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 187
Splatting 131
120% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 874 470 477 474 476 474 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 717 624 496 406 505 505 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 115%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
419GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 184 190 173 209 205 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 367
Write 326
Mixed 318
SusWrite 193
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 47.8
158% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 218
159% 209 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 134%
Toshiba MG03ACA400 4TB
239GB free
Firmware: FL1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 154 154 121 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 150
Write 132
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 148
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 96%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
963GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 120 114 107 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 100
Write 102
Mixed 93
SusWrite 114
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 83%
WD Red Pro 3TB (2014)-$170
2TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 88 88 83 68 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 167
Write 163
Mixed 120
SusWrite 86.6
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 101%
WD Red Pro 3TB (2014)-$170
1.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 158 156 149 146 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 153
Write 106
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 146
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86%
Great: 101%
Covecube Virtual Disk 1TB
52GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 8.3 8.3 7.6 4.2 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 32
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 6.1
19% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.1
32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2750 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 46.5
MC Mixed 42
127% 44.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 24.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 53.5
75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 116%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $924
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback