Hp-pavilion AU914AA-ABL p6241f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHp-pavilion AU914AA-ABL p6241f  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Benicia
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '18 at 14:29
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 33.3
2-Core 67
40% 58.3 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 132
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570
Dell(1028 2121) 1GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.85% Terrible
Lighting 8.53
Reflection 9.58
Parallax 10.6
7% 9.56 fps
MRender 8.14
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 8.48
7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.85%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
raid 320GB
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 37 37 39 41 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 129
Write 38.2
Mixed 50
SusWrite 37
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
22.2% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 7
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback