HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP xw8600 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081015
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '18 at 07:40
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5405 294 User benchmarks, average bench 42% XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	41% Average	Memory 61 1-Core 28 2-Core 57.5 33% 48.8 Pts	4-Core 114 8-Core 221 20% 168 Pts	64-Core 219 14% 219 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	7.31% Terrible	Lighting 8.4 Reflection 7.62 Parallax 9.03 7% 8.35 fps	MRender 8.62 Gravity 10.4 Splatting 10.7 8% 9.89 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.31% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 54 57 57 57 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.7% Poor	Read 253 Write 57.8 Mixed 91.3 SusWrite 56.1 25% 115 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 4.6 43% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 92%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 122 125 123 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 134 Write 122 Mixed 71 SusWrite 123 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 86%
SanDisk SDSSDA12 120GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 112GB free, PID 1068 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.8% Below average	Read 33.5 Write 25.5 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 25.9 38% 28.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 4.8 427% 6 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 242%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 65GB 1,017 User benchmarks, average bench 19% null MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	20% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 8.7 20% 6.83 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 4.7 13% 4.57 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 826 samples	21x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 324 samples	17x
Xeon X5450Intel $299Bench 50%, 5,870 samples	12x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	9x
Quadro FX 5600NvidiaBench 6%, 254 samples	9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	8x

SSD
870 QVO 2TBSamsung $149Bench 102%, 41,734 samples	9x
870 EVO 250G 250GBSamsungBench 92%, 167 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
49GBUnknownBench 18%, 1,461 samples	45x
65GBUnknownBench 19%, 1,017 samples	36x
41GBUnknownBench 17%, 2,583 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $149

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16