Toshiba Satellite S55-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite S55-A (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA VG10S
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140919
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '18 at 04:36
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 81.2 2-Core 150 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 405 42% 340 Pts	64-Core 407 25% 407 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA46) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3234 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.74% Terrible	Lighting 4.13 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 4.91 3% 4.85 fps	MRender 7.76 Gravity 1.87 Splatting 6.52 4% 5.38 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.74% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 162 Write 99.7 Mixed 80.5 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 19.8 4K Mixed 10.1 46% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 11.5 DQ Write 23.4 DQ Mixed 12.5 11% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 474GB free Firmware: JA0OA560 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 81 83 82 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 87 Write 84 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 82.1 52% 71.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 57%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 29GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 6.4 7.1 7.1 7.2 7.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	7.56% Terrible	Read 27.5 Write 3.5 Mixed 15.8 SusWrite 7.3 15% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 1 62% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.56% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73CB0-YK0 2x8GB 473 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	56.7% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 17.1 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 18.3 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite S55-A Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite S55-A

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	98x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	30x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	85x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	35x
GeForce GT 740MNvidiaBench 6%, 15,605 samples	16x

SSD
S3 1T02 1TBSandiskBench 102%, 12,047 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 47%, 2,211 samples	26x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 18,159 samples	10x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16