Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '18 at 16:22
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 46.3
2-Core 119
50% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 282
31% 246 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
XFX(1682 3252) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Lighting 37.1
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 45
30% 38.5 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 38.8
28% 33 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 257 212 222 209 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 286
Write 366
Mixed 248
SusWrite 229
64% 282 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 30.9
104% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.5
DQ Write 85.1
DQ Mixed 39.9
35% 51.2 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 107%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
552GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 67 68 69 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 55.5
Mixed 41
SusWrite 67.8
42% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 51%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1.5TB
863GB free, PID 0b1a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 43.5
Write 51.3
Mixed 20
SusWrite 94
74% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 VS2GB1333D4 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 VS2GB1333D4 12GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.2% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 9.2
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback