Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '18 at 10:25
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 452
46% 375 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.3% Average
Lighting 60.5
Reflection 68
Parallax 59.7
49% 62.7 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 58.5
Splatting 53.4
49% 61.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 321 295 233 236 230 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 349
Write 231
Mixed 204
SusWrite 266
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 15.8
82% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 209
150% 192 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 99%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
188GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 393 354 362 355 341 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 402
Mixed 374
SusWrite 360
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 57.8
191% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 365
275% 367 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
843GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 101 101 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 104
Write 97.2
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 100
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 859B BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 859B BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18.1
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,004 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback