PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 6.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP EliteBook 8730w (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 30EC |
Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20111207 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 20 '18 at 10:18 |
Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300-$172
Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
|
48.2%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M
HP(103C 0539) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95
|
6.28%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 183 179 202 166 143 MB/s
|
46.9%
Average
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
100GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 244 232 242 232 235 MB/s
|
70%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
18.6%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 14x |
Core2 Duo T9400Intel $55Bench 39%, 3,295 samples | 7x |
Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro FX 2700MNvidiaBench 3%, 788 samples | 23x |
Mobility Radeon HD 3670ATIBench 2%, 405 samples | 13x |
Quadro FX 3700MNvidiaBench 6%, 383 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 34% - Below average | Total price: $230 |