| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 3.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
| System | HP xw4600 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AA0h |
| Memory | 0.9 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20101028 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 19 '18 at 22:45 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | COL-User |
| Background CPU | 62% |
| CPU Throttled | 90% |
PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
24.9%
Poor
|
21% 30.2 Pts
|
6% 44.5 Pts
|
2% 41.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
3.91%
Terrible
|
4% 4.44 fps
|
4% 4.89 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 35 44 35 58 57 MB/s
|
29.2%
Poor
|
30% 39.8 MB/s
|
115% 0.7 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
257GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 111 124 132 130 126 MB/s
|
71.5%
Very good
|
79% 108 MB/s
|
119% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 40GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 36864 MB
|
12.2%
Very poor
|
11% 3.9 GB/s
|
11% 3.77 GB/s
|
21% 191 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical xw4600 Workstation Builds (Compare 189 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP xw4600 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 24x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 21x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 18x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 17x |
| Quadro FX 1700NvidiaBench 1%, 2,013 samples | 12x |
| Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples | 11x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $129 |