HP Compaq Elite 8300 MT

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3397
Memory	9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '18 at 22:21
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	BIH-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 214 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 517 54% 434 Pts	64-Core 521 32% 521 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85D7) 2GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1902 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 28.8 Parallax 35.3 31% 34.2 fps	MRender 40.7 Gravity 36.9 Splatting 36.4 31% 38 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 40 51 51 48 45 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.9% Below average	Read 172 Write 73 Mixed 148 SusWrite 69.4 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 19.6 85% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 27 DQ Write 65.5 DQ Mixed 22.3 24% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 204GB free Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 103 104 103 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 87 Write 88.6 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 104 59% 81.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR5040MM58F9F1600 0443 RMR5040MM58F9F1600 Transcend JM1600KLN-4G 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	45.6% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 13.4 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 12.2 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 MT Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 MT

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	230x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	118x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	80x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	101x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	58x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	33x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	26x
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	13x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 28%, 425 samples	18x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	13x
RMR5030EB68F9W1600 0443 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 8GBUnknownBench 49%, 36 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16