Zoostorm 7200-5282B

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	65.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Zoostorm 7200-5282B (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK H170-PRO
Memory	7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160506
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '18 at 18:30
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 83.4 2-Core 145 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 350 44% 337 Pts	64-Core 257 16% 257 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	65.4% Good	Lighting 87.3 Reflection 47.5 Parallax 75.6 71% 70.1 fps	MRender 81.5 Gravity 78.2 Splatting 47.7 54% 69.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT128G1122 128GB 1,041 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2333000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 153 161 159 146 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 345 Write 165 Mixed 155 SusWrite 149 45% 204 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 41.5 4K Mixed 9.6 56% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 77 83% 138 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 70%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 18GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 101 120 108 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 119 Write 117 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 104 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.1 209% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2TB free Firmware: 0708 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 122 123 125 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 113 Write 136 Mixed 76.8 SusWrite 123 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GB 3,829 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.3% Good	MC Read 24.9 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 22.7 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 14.2 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7200-5282B Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

System: Zoostorm 7200-5282B

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	17x
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	2x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	18x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	1x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	1x

SSD
SD8SNAT128G1122 128GBSandiskBench 61%, 1,041 samples	8x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	2x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	2x

RAM
CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 72%, 3,829 samples	9x
CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FN 2x16GBCrucialBench 94%, 121 samples	4x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 121% - Outstanding

Total price: $211

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16