Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '18 at 16:24
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 100
2-Core 200
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 513
56% 444 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 156
Parallax 109
121% 138 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 142
Splatting 108
112% 141 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 109 113 110 78 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.6% Above average
Read 250
Write 149
Mixed 158
SusWrite 98.5
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 26.1
96% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 118
94% 130 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 75%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
173GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 306 304 303 301 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 488
Write 471
Mixed 390
SusWrite 318
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 37.9
125% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 284
208% 269 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
600GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 188 189 189 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 185
Mixed 101
SusWrite 188
123% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 110%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 13.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $575
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback