Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W280 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110406
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '18 at 13:45
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 86.5 2-Core 157 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 363 39% 310 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI FirePro 3800 (FireGL) Graphics Adapter 464 User benchmarks, average bench 4% AMD(1002 210A) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.34% Terrible	Lighting 4.53 Reflection 5.15 Parallax 4.75 4% 4.81 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 4.27 Splatting 4 3% 3.09 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.34% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49 13,478 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 226 109 179 157 174 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.6% Above average	Read 240 Write 238 Mixed 208 SusWrite 178 49% 216 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 29.1 93% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 159 125% 171 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 108%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 187GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 124 125 125 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 129 Write 125 Mixed 74.2 SusWrite 124 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BA160B.C16F 4x4GB 589 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.1% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 11.8 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 12.1 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 61.7 65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W280 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	21x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	9x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	1x

GPU
FirePro 3800 (FireGL) Graphics AdapterATIBench 4%, 464 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	3x
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	2x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBUnknownBench 37%, 202 samples	3x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	2x
CM3X2G1600C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 50%, 173 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $129

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16