| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180907 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 19 '18 at 13:26 |
| Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
76.6%
Very good
|
76% 139 Pts
|
72% 592 Pts
|
75% 1,208 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.1%
Below average
|
32% 40.8 fps
|
40% 49.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1,273% 5,704 MB/s
|
993% 280 MB/s
|
703% 979 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
73GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 235 234 236 237 240 MB/s
|
70.1%
Very good
|
50% 222 MB/s
|
105% 40.7 MB/s
|
102% 207 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1TB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 93 90 85 92 93 MB/s
|
28.2%
Poor
|
34% 46.7 MB/s
|
94% 0.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
76.5%
Very good
|
79% 27.5 GB/s
|
69% 24.1 GB/s
|
40% 101 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,527 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 417x |
| Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 326x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 204x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 214x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 194x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 189x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $847 |