Asus UN62

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

CPU throttled at 70% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus UN62 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK UN62
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150109
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '18 at 13:24
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	CHN-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	70%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4210U 82,966 User benchmarks, average bench 41% BGA-1168, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Memory 83.4 1-Core 79.8 2-Core 128 60% 97.2 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 187 25% 188 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4206 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	3.34% Terrible	Lighting 3.37 Reflection 5.65 Parallax 5.69 3% 4.9 fps	MRender 7.24 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 6.87 4% 5.38 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.34% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB 4,026 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT41B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 445 Write 406 Mixed 328 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 38.7 126% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 291 220% 298 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 118%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 22GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 18 19 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 27.6 Write 19.5 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 19.3 29% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 44%
USB Flash Disk 2GB 1,397 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7 7 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	5.66% Terrible	Read 21.5 Write 9 Mixed 18.3 SusWrite 7.1 17% 14 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.66% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB 22,647 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 17.3 54% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 18.5 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical UN62 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus UN62

CPU
Core i3-4010UIntel $280Bench 44%, 12,162 samples	9x
Core i3-4030UIntelBench 45%, 24,177 samples	5x
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples	5x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	18x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
HFS128G3AMNB-2200A 128GBBench 67%, 1,805 samples	7x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	2x
M4 256GB mSATACrucial $378Bench 59%, 22 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	2x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	2x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $280

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16