Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160517
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '18 at 11:01
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 104 2-Core 200 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 399 53% 399 Pts	64-Core 392 24% 392 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3722) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Lighting 66.5 Reflection 66.1 Parallax 56.6 54% 63 fps	MRender 69.5 Gravity 63.3 Splatting 65.7 54% 66.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 288 270 263 265 253 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	180% Outstanding	Read 1,113 Write 958 Mixed 632 SusWrite 304 168% 752 MB/s	4K Read 51.8 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 50.8 222% 83.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,061 DQ Write 1,204 DQ Mixed 708 651% 991 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 236%
Toshiba Q300 120GB 1,888 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 33GB free Firmware: SAFM11.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 72 78 71 73 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 472 Write 402 Mixed 336 SusWrite 79.2 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 93.3 4K Mixed 38.1 145% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 353 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 168 149% 229 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 743GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 160 162 163 163 163 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 139 Mixed 95.3 SusWrite 160 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.3 119% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 109%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 635GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 138 138 136 140 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	69% Good	Read 104 Write 107 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 136 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 96%
WDC WD20 EARX-32PASB0 2TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 457GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 98 97 95 96 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 86 Write 89 Mixed 76 SusWrite 95.3 119% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 40%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 0.4 0.8 0 0 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 154 Write 132 Mixed 84.3 SusWrite 2.5 113% 93.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 73%
Lexar SD USB_3_0 Read 64GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 13GB free, PID b050 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 14 14 16 14 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 90.3 Write 80.3 Mixed 76.2 SusWrite 14.3 84% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 6.5 424% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 48%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 320GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 98 97 95 95 98 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 179 Write 148 Mixed 89 SusWrite 95.1 163% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 77%
Lexar MSD USB_3_0 Read 32GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 29GB free, PID b050 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 17 16 15 17 15 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	9.73% Terrible	Read 22 Write 5 Mixed 9 SusWrite 15.5 16% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 48% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.73% Great: 24%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00GXCB0 3TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 994GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 0.7 1.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Read 133 Write 140 Mixed 112 SusWrite 1.3 124% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-027.A00G 9905678-023.A00G 16GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 21.6 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 27.5 SC Mixed 21.9 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	392x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	382x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	353x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	400x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	347x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	217x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	115x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	115x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	69x

RAM
9905678-012.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 1,882 samples	56x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	53x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $295

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16