Acer Aspire 8940G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire 8940G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer SM80-CP
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '18 at 07:07
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 92.1
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 108
58% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 215
22% 179 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250M
Acer(1025 026B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 5.62
Parallax 2.06
4% 4.23 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 3.47
Splatting 3
3% 4.01 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 219 210 213 212 209 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.4% Above average
Read 223
Write 214
Mixed 222
SusWrite 212
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 22
70% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 190
143% 190 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 128%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33
208GB free
Firmware: FG001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 52 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 51.8
Write 54.3
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 53.5
35% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 42%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
15GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.9 6.8 6.9 6.2 5.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Read 23.6
Write 5.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 6.5
10% 9.98 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 10%
ST310005 20AS 1TB
674GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 27.4
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 10.2
29% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 19%
WDC WD20 EADS-11R6B1 2TB
1TB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 9.9 10 10 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10% Terrible
Read 27.5
Write 26.9
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 10
28% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10%
Great: 20%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB
431GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 25.4
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 10.1
29% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 20%
WDC WD50 00BPVT-24HXZT1 500GB
79GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 9.8 10 10 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 26.1
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 10
29% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
76% 0.87 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 15h Reserved 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
36.2% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 9.9
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 8940G Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 8940G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $300
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback