Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5460 616 User benchmarks, average bench 48% XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Memory 65 1-Core 45.3 2-Core 91.1 42% 67.1 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 364 32% 272 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4600 1,222 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 0408) 768MB Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.0 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	4.36% Terrible	Lighting 5.43 Reflection 6.77 Parallax 1.94 4% 4.71 fps	MRender 5.95 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 5.22 4% 5.16 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.36% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Volume0 480GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 371GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 276 98 56 52 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 226 Write 383 Mixed 278 SusWrite 134 58% 255 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 38.1 4K Mixed 27 89% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 162 126% 171 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 65GB 1,017 User benchmarks, average bench 19% null MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 9.1 20% 7.07 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 3.9 13% 4.47 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 826 samples	21x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 324 samples	17x
Xeon X5450Intel $299Bench 50%, 5,870 samples	12x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	9x
Quadro FX 5600NvidiaBench 6%, 254 samples	9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	8x

SSD
870 QVO 2TBSamsung $145Bench 102%, 41,734 samples	9x
870 EVO 250G 250GBSamsungBench 92%, 167 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $145

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16