Foxconn Q57M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Foxconn Q57M (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN Q57M
Memory	2.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101108
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '18 at 20:16
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Memory 73.1 1-Core 80.3 2-Core 152 60% 102 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 202 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570 19,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% PwrHis(1787 2308) 1GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	3.79% Terrible	Lighting 4.8 Reflection 5.38 Parallax 5.59 4% 5.26 fps	MRender 3.81 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 4.04 4% 4.35 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.79% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 50 57 56 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 74.1 Write 74.9 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 52.4 46% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 55%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 21GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 55 70 62 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 49.6 Write 50.2 Mixed 34.6 SusWrite 61.7 36% 49 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 116% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 55%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 24GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 60 61 61 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 65.5 Write 65.3 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 60.5 43% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 55%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 8GB 2,703 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 1643 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.4 3.6 4.2 4.2 4.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	1.53% Terrible	Read 2.5 Write 0.7 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 3.5 3% 2.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.53% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 13.8 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 8.3 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 94.4 42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q57M Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Foxconn Q57M

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Foxconn Q57M

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Foxconn Q57M

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)