EVGA 132-CK-NF79

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	NVIDIA 132-CK-NF79
Motherboard	EVGA 132-CK-NF79 (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091230
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '18 at 17:01
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	94%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850 1,078 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Memory 81.3 1-Core 32.8 2-Core 58.8 41% 57.6 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 109 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450 15,395 User benchmarks, average bench 23% EVGA(3842 1584) 3GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Lighting 23.5 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 31 19% 28.5 fps	MRender 42.1 Gravity 21.7 Splatting 31.5 26% 31.8 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 57 89 135 148 92 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.6% Average	Read 196 Write 102 Mixed 158 SusWrite 105 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 29.9 4K Mixed 26.4 75% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 79.5 DQ Write 69.9 DQ Mixed 76.1 57% 75.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.6 11 10 24 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 135 Write 25.7 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 11.8 37% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.9 191% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DRAM Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5 16% 5.67 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.3 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 132-CK-NF79 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Sail boat

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: EVGA 132-CK-NF79

CPU
Core2 Extreme X9770IntelBench 57%, 522 samples	13x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	7x
Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	4x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
Sol id State Dis 512GBSpccBench 52%, 11 samples	4x
860 EVO 500GBSamsungBench 68%, 207 samples	3x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	15x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	11x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $228

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16