| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | HP Z620 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158A |
| Memory | 58 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131219 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 18 '18 at 15:12 |
| Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
72.1%
Very good
|
67% 114 Pts
|
58% 484 Pts
|
100% 1,612 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 843B) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30
|
20.7%
Poor
|
20% 25.3 fps
|
22% 27.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 224 218 213 207 213 MB/s
|
90.6%
Outstanding
|
86% 385 MB/s
|
136% 48.3 MB/s
|
257% 336 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
2TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 145 147 148 147 149 MB/s
|
84.6%
Excellent
|
95% 130 MB/s
|
178% 1.33 MB/s
| |
|
WD My Book 1140 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 29 28 MB/s
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
37% 27.1 MB/s
|
108% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 8x8GB
8 of 12 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
89.3%
Excellent
|
104% 36.3 GB/s
|
22% 7.83 GB/s
|
52% 77.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,396 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z620 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 150x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 147x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 129x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 169x |
| Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 113x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 95x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $345 |