PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 79% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision WorkStation 690 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0F9394 |
Memory | 25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20060630 |
Uptime | 9.6 Days |
Run Date | Nov 18 '18 at 08:52 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5355
Microprocessor, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
43.8%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
79%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 230 222 236 246 244 MB/s
|
73%
Very good
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
370GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 26 26 26 MB/s
|
15%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
18.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples | 8x |
CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 632 samples | 6x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X53551stBench 42%, 426 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 6x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |