Acer Predator G3610

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Acer Predator G3610 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator G3610
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '18 at 00:35
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 89.6 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 172 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 331 44% 332 Pts	64-Core 335 21% 335 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B1) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Lighting 73.4 Reflection 73.3 Parallax 63.5 60% 70 fps	MRender 72.9 Gravity 69.7 Splatting 75.4 60% 72.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 405 378 371 357 353 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 458 Mixed 383 SusWrite 362 94% 420 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 59.1 4K Mixed 44.5 144% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 340 256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 134%
WD 10EADS External 1TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 549GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 12 12 23 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 25.2 Write 16.5 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 16.8 25% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.3 50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-466.A00LF 2x8GB 311 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	52.5% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 17 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G3610 Builds (Compare 347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3610

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	194x
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples	64x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	18x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	27x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	23x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x

RAM
ACR512X64D3U13C9G 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,166 samples	24x
NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG 4x4GBNanyaBench 48%, 227 samples	17x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $356

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16