Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming X (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180418
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '18 at 00:10
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Memory 74 1-Core 122 2-Core 244 80% 147 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 894 83% 692 Pts	64-Core 1,344 83% 1,344 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing below potential (88^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (66 fps cap detected)	53.8% Above average	Lighting 66.3 Reflection 66.7 Parallax 63.3 54% 65.4 fps	MRender 65.7 Gravity 62.4 Splatting 66.4 53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 551 246 258 255 254 251 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	156% Outstanding	Read 1742 Write 1,405 Mixed 524 SusWrite 302 220% 993 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 97 4K Mixed 45.7 167% 60.1 MB/s	DQ Read 406 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 375 280% 373 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 236%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 212GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 90 89 89 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 108 Write 132 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 89 65% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 1.8 335% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x4GB 13,047 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	MC Read 33.5 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 26.8 87% 30.4 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 24.3 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 92.4 43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	26x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	16x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	13x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	13x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	9x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	7x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $398

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16