Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '18 at 21:24
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 78.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 253
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 848
83% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,368
85% 1,368 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6391) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 152
Parallax 163
110% 150 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 141
Splatting 105
96% 118 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$85
739GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 370 373 430 438 437 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 460
Write 441
Mixed 362
SusWrite 398
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 24.4
94% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 89.2
DQ Mixed 78.2
64% 92.2 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 121%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 166 165 167 166 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 206
Mixed 110
SusWrite 167
120% 163 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
372% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 107%
WD Se 2TB (2013)-$74
73GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 83 85 86 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 87
Write 88.7
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 84.2
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.2% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 15
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 9
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $791
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback