Capital Neo

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Capital Neo (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DH61WW
Memory	4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '18 at 19:11
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	84%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G620-$30 12,899 User benchmarks, average bench 46% LGA1155 CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	53% Above average	Memory 84 1-Core 67.5 2-Core 134 58% 95.3 Pts	4-Core 131 8-Core 132 18% 131 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.7% Below average	Lighting 39.8 Reflection 30.4 Parallax 37.5 32% 35.9 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 35.2 30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD230S 256GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1025F8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 201 226 111 56 241 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.3% Above average	Read 249 Write 233 Mixed 234 SusWrite 171 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 27.4 94% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 169 135% 189 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 114%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 189GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 133 133 136 138 134 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 88 Write 30.7 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 135 56% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.2 203% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown JM1333KLN-2G CT51264BD160B.C16F 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33% Below average	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 9.9 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 10 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Neo Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Capital Neo

CPU
Pentium G620Intel $30Bench 46%, 12,899 samples	6x
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	6x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	4x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	12x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	3x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	1x

RAM
RM25664BA1339.8FR 2x2GBRamaxelBench 45%, 149 samples	3x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	2x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $58

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16