Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 820-$119 2,269 User benchmarks, average bench 52% None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.33% Terrible	Memory 10.1 1-Core 7.3 2-Core 14.7 7% 10.7 Pts	4-Core 24.9 8-Core 36.3 4% 30.6 Pts	64-Core 36.7 2% 36.7 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 7.33% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 880M 4,542 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 2145) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.0 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	2.77% Terrible	Lighting 3.17 Reflection 4.88 Parallax 1.25 3% 3.1 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 3.61 3% 3.92 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.77% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 235GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 173 177 182 179 181 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.4% Below average	Read 197 Write 176 Mixed 188 SusWrite 177 42% 184 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 10 33% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 32.3 DQ Write 32.5 DQ Mixed 33.1 25% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 859B CT51264BF160B.M16F 802C 16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1066, 1600, 1066 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15% Very poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 5.6 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 1 5% 1.6 GB/s	Latency 403 10% 403 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 15%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core i7 Q 820Intel $119Bench 52%, 2,269 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro FX 880MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,542 samples	1x

RAM
MEMORY 0443 RMT3020EF48E8W1333 MEMORY 0443 RMT3010KC58E8F1333 16GBAXIOMBench 27%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $119

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16