Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	67.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '18 at 08:34
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	66%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 71.7 1-Core 46 2-Core 132 49% 83.4 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 692 51% 461 Pts	64-Core 814 50% 814 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.4% Good	Lighting 77.4 Reflection 101 Parallax 98.7 63% 92.2 fps	MRender 91 Gravity 90.8 Splatting 95 76% 92.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 658 408 393 383 375 367 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 1,468 Write 1,314 Mixed 520 SusWrite 431 207% 933 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 37.6 132% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 879 DQ Write 734 DQ Mixed 649 529% 754 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 254%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 47GB free Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 338 356 370 390 384 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Read 398 Write 360 Mixed 346 SusWrite 358 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 35.1 111% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 301 242% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 38GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 315 161 133 122 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Read 386 Write 373 Mixed 337 SusWrite 198 73% 323 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 36.8 122% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 358 270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 134%
Toshiba Q Series Pro 256GB-$109 1,725 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 127GB free Firmware: JTRA0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 353 364 376 398 390 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Read 398 Write 390 Mixed 393 SusWrite 369 88% 388 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 49.7 4K Mixed 29.8 94% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 320 244% 329 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 20,017 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 33.1 96% 33.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 21.9 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 97.4 41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)