To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	1.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100412
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '18 at 04:00
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	84%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 430 1,061 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Memory 35.7 1-Core 11.3 2-Core 11.2 16% 19.4 Pts	4-Core 4 8-Core 10 1% 7 Pts	64-Core 11.6 1% 11.6 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS5C1050CLA382 500GB 2,940 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC2OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 51 36 8.4 67 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 88.3 Write 95.5 Mixed 41.8 SusWrite 48.4 50% 68.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 63%
WD WD800BB-88JHC0 80GB 2,880 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 57GB free Firmware: 05.01C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 27 20 7.4 37 35 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 44.8 Write 28.5 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 26.7 22% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 31%
MBIL SSM Moser Baer Disk 4GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 0001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 2.7 2.3 2.3 3.7 3.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	2.82% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 4 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 3 6% 5.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.82% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	5.3% Terrible	MC Read 1.5 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.6 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 0.9 SC Mixed 1 2% 0.73 GB/s	Latency 223 18% 223 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 5.3% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	712x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	616x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	102x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16