Asus P7P55D-E PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E PRO (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120626
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '18 at 02:13
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 56 2-Core 127 58% 92.1 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 269 35% 265 Pts	64-Core 269 17% 269 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5870 10,176 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Asus(1043 032E) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 27.6 Reflection 14.9 Parallax 25.4 22% 22.6 fps	MRender 13.3 Gravity 21.2 Splatting 19.1 15% 17.9 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 20%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 122 112 123 123 124 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	72% Very good	Read 264 Write 252 Mixed 250 SusWrite 119 50% 221 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 69.2 4K Mixed 43.5 146% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 178 139% 190 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 129%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 14GB free Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 54 56 56 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 55.4 Write 54.2 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 55.7 40% 54.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 694GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 125 114 124 124 124 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 182 Write 177 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 120 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 112%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 42GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 67 72 73 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 61.9 Write 73.8 Mixed 39.3 SusWrite 70 45% 61.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 74%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 164GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 51 47 51 51 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	52.5% Above average	Read 131 Write 130 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 51.7 67% 91.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.2 245% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 109%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 49 46 50 50 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	55% Above average	Read 143 Write 99.9 Mixed 36 SusWrite 48.7 60% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 101%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 45GB free Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 95 86 95 96 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 123 Write 105 Mixed 100 SusWrite 92.7 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 167GB free Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 74 78 79 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 56.6 Write 55.4 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 77.6 45% 60.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	42.9% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 14.5 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 11 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E PRO Builds (Compare 345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E PRO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	79x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	76x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	134x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	121x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $426

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16