Fujitsu CELSIUS R930power

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R930power (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3118-A2
Memory	124 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '18 at 22:30
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 766 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 85.4 1-Core 105 2-Core 204 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 686 66% 542 Pts	64-Core 2,023 125% 2,023 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 411.63 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 19 12% 16.2 fps	MRender 21.2 Gravity 18.5 Splatting 16.8 15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 335GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 243 241 225 244 244 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	79.9% Very good	Read 243 Write 232 Mixed 232 SusWrite 240 54% 237 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 70.8 4K Mixed 46.8 154% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 162 122% 163 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 775GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1672 1535 1408 1152 1150 1147 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	280% Outstanding	Read 2,462 Write 1,893 Mixed 1,519 SusWrite 1,344 403% 1,804 MB/s	4K Read 55.3 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 72.2 236% 80.3 MB/s	DQ Read 678 DQ Write 482 DQ Mixed 631 458% 597 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 280% Great: 372%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C 8x16GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 55.6 MC Write 38.5 MC Mixed 41.2 129% 45.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 8 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R930power Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R930power

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v21stBench 75%, 766 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v21stBench 64%, 1,265 samples	1x

GPU
GTX TitanNvidia $1,088Bench 47%, 6,806 samples	2x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	2x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	2x

SSD
HG5d Q Series 256GBToshiba $225Bench 82%, 3,223 samples	1x
THNSNH512GCST 512GBToshibaBench 81%, 323 samples	1x
Extreme 120GBSanDisk $160Bench 69%, 11,787 samples	1x

RAM
M391B5273DH0- Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A M391B5273DH0- Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A M391B5273DH0- Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A M391B5273DH0- Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A M391B5273DH... 64GBSamsungBench 83%, 2 samples	2x
HMT41GR7AFR8C 4x8GBHynixBench 90%, 43 samples	1x
M393B2G70BH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 80%, 218 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $1,313

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16