Toshiba Satellite A200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba Satellite A200  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA ISKAA
Memory3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '18 at 21:25
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Duo T7500-$70
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
1-Core 34.6
2-Core 67.4
24% 51 Pts
4-Core 68.2
8-Core 68.9
9% 68.6 Pts
64-Core 68.6
5% 68.6 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 18%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600
Toshiba(1179 FF00) 256MB
Driver: atidxx32 Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 2.7
1% 5.7 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 6.5
1% 4.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$22
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 103 44 46 52 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.2% Average
Read 244
Write 177
Mixed 196
SusWrite 76.9
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 17
75% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 105
82% 114 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 81%
Toshiba MK2035GSS 200GB-$285
167GB free
Firmware: DK020M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 19 18 18 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 30
Write 29.3
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 18.5
18% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14%
Great: 21%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
4GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 11 11 3.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
8.31% Terrible
Read 32.7
Write 18.8
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 10.3
20% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.31%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.8
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Satellite A200 Builds (Compare 188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite A200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 14% - Very poor Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback