ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Razer Blade
Motherboard	Razer DANA_MB
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1768 x 992 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180831
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '18 at 19:05
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 126 2-Core 253 85% 154 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 471 48% 390 Pts	64-Core 598 37% 598 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2001) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6169 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.19% Terrible	Lighting 7.5 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 7.56 6% 8.87 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 6.8 Splatting 15 9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.19% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV6-8Q128 128GB 522 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2871302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 88 105 105 105 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 358 Write 106 Mixed 141 SusWrite 102 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 25.8 4K Mixed 8.8 37% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 117 100% 152 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 771GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 116 121 124 125 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 54.7 Write 115 Mixed 53.9 SusWrite 122 63% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.6 168% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	77.3% Very good	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 22.3 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 25.3 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback