Asrock P67 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock P67 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130122
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '18 at 15:55
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 172
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 446
44% 361 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (68 fps cap detected)
53.7% Above average
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 67.1
56% 68 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 63.6
Splatting 54.2
50% 62 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 259 265 262 272 269 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 457
Write 409
Mixed 358
SusWrite 276
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 37.1
120% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 173
162% 251 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 118%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
233GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 536 562 292 303 303 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,085
Write 858
Mixed 474
SusWrite 414
157% 708 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 41
143% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 643
DQ Write 513
DQ Mixed 556
422% 570 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 138%
Great: 236%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
132GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 61 58 61 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 60.2
Write 58.3
Mixed 49
SusWrite 59.9
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 76%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30
312GB free
Firmware: 0002LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 44 44 43 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 78.2
Write 52
Mixed 31
SusWrite 43.5
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 61%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$105
817GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 106 103 106 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 108
Write 82.8
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 105
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.8% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme6 - $202

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $681
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback