| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung 300E5E/300E4E/300E5V/300E4V (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP300E5V-A02IN |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121225 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 16 '18 at 04:35 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | IND-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.1%
Above average
|
57% 93.4 Pts
|
22% 162 Pts
|
10% 166 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C708) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2875
|
0.92%
Terrible
|
0% 2.36 fps
|
3% 2.61 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX002F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 71 46 60 64 48 MB/s
|
27.9%
Poor
|
32% 44.6 MB/s
|
90% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown AM1U16BC2P1-B1AC 830B NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
|
43.7%
Average
|
43% 15.2 GB/s
|
36% 12.7 GB/s
|
47% 85.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E5E/300E4E/300E5V/300E4V Builds (Compare 62 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E5E/300E4E/300E5V/300E4V
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples | 28x |
| Celeron 847Intel $259Bench 34%, 3,990 samples | 14x |
| Pentium 2117UIntelBench 43%, 5,157 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $128 |