PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20130711 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Nov 16 '18 at 00:48 |
Run Duration | 238 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
XFX(1682 3221) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB
25GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 66 66 66 66 MB/s
|
38.7%
Below average
|
|||
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 140 139 140 138 MB/s
|
84.1%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
13GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 58 60 61 92 MB/s
|
47%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HTS723232A7A364 320GB
2GB free
Firmware: EC2OA60W
|
||||
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
43GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 9.3 MB/s
|
10%
Terrible
|
|||
Generic MassStorageClass 16GB
8GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 564x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 138x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 80x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 67x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 62x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 59x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $610 |