Asus M4A87TD/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A87TD/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	7.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20110308
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '18 at 21:41
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	60% Good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 50.2 2-Core 100 51% 78.7 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 201 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% PNY(196E 11BF) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.3% Below average	Lighting 40.2 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 38.2 33% 36.6 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 38.6 Splatting 37.4 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB 10,663 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 285GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 104 103 106 105 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 116 Write 109 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 99.8 73% 99.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 232GB free Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 128 130 130 130 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 129 Write 122 Mixed 49.7 SusWrite 124 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-014.A00LF Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 10GB 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.4% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 12.2 34% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 9.7 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A87TD/USB3 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	41x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	24x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	22x

GPU
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	8x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	6x

SSD
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	7x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	5x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x

RAM
99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5471-002.A01LF Team--Elite-133300 8GBKingstonBench 26%, 4 samples	3x
M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG KRE-D3U1600M/8G000 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 18GBNanyaBench 27%, 6 samples	3x
DDR3 2000G DDR3 2000G Kingston 9905403-431.A00LF Kingston 9905403-431.A00LF 12GBAdataBench 27%, 9 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16